|
Post by rubberneck on Jun 30, 2010 12:27:49 GMT
Peel still hold a 35% stake in the airport group, and as such take revenue from the business and general aviation that passes through DSA - so why would they spend money on SCA for use by business and general aviation and thus taking the business away from DSA? Or to that matter develop it for any aircraft use having already been burnt in that area - although I concede it could be turned in to a heliport.
|
|
|
Post by elmfield on Jun 30, 2010 13:21:17 GMT
I believe the comment was said "a little tongue in cheek"! Peel are as likely to re-open SCA as England is to win the World Cup. You say Peel has been burnt at SCA? Well, considering they started to close it down within weeks of acquiring it, and bought a site valued at around £240 million ,when developed, for a £1, they could hardly be said to have been burnt could they?They quite clearly bought it to close it! Their last reported figures to the JLC for operating SCA shows a yearly loss of just £100,000 after rent ( which under the Lease should NOT have been incurred) of £297,000 had been charged. Some finger burning!!!
|
|
|
Post by rubberneck on Jun 30, 2010 19:07:05 GMT
when I said burnt I was talking about the whole Peel Airport Group - where they were losing money across all the airports, hence the need to sell a stake to Vancouver Airport Group.
|
|
|
Post by elmfield on Jul 1, 2010 10:09:07 GMT
I totally agree with you on that one!
|
|
|
Post by john2408 on Aug 30, 2010 21:14:41 GMT
The airport getting bad customer service/report in all aspects of the working and buidings,at the airport.see DSA Prune.today. Really bad reports.
|
|