Post by expressflight on Dec 26, 2009 9:40:51 GMT
Here are my thoughts as to what 2010 might bring as far as passenger services are concerned and I would be pleased to know what others think.
2009 marked the first year that SEN has not had a resident airline (following the closure of Flightline), the loss of the Ford CGN route and the JER service reverting to Summer Saturdays only after a rather feeble attempt in 2008 to introduce an additional Wednesday flight. I don't recall a single passenger charter during the whole year, other than the local flights in the DC3 and Rapide. The only bright spot was that LCY diversions continued to offer a glimpse of the sort of activity the future could hold. All in all a very disappointing year; although perhaps that is not surprising in light of the downturn in the economy which will have made all airlines nervous of starting new routes.
So what are the prospects for 2010? Let me say firstly that I have no information on any definite plans by any airline, although I do detect a certain cautious optimism that there may be tentative plans which are yet to be firmed up. It is certainly true that Stobarts reviewed the station project earlier this year and concluded that it should proceed. There must have been a basis for reaching this conclusion and it has long been the airport's belief that the station will be key to attracting airline operators to SEN. I must reluctantly say that I am a little surprised that a station some 400 metres from the existing terminal is felt to offer much greater appeal than does the existing station at Rochford, as I assume a bus link will be required as it is a considerable distance to walk. A station attached to the planned new terminal would/will be a completely different matter, as time from aircraft to platform could be as little as 5 minutes. I can only assume that an airline or two has suggested that even with the existing terminal in use, the psychological/marketing advantage of SEN having a dedicated rail station will be the clincher to commencing services. Let's hope so at least.
So let's have a look at how feasible this sounds when considering real route possibilities.
To take the very latest 'rumour' doing the rounds, how about the planned Aer Arann/Aer Lingus tie-up which 'could' involve up to seven ATR's being DUB-based for Ireland-UK operations commencing in Spring. Aer Arann have certainly expressed an interest in SEN and discussions have taken place over the past couple of years so, theoretically, this new operation could offer SEN an opportunity. The right route, the right aircraft and the participation of an operator with SEN in mind for potential services, so it all looks feasible on paper, but even as I write this it all sounds so unlikely somehow. Could we really see services into SEN by the Irish flag carrier? The main problem I see is that SEN's advantage of having access to the Greater London/Essex market is also, ironically, its greatest disadvantage. Aer Lingus already operate substantially from LGW with frequent daily services to DUB, so would they want to risk diluting that market with a twice-daily DUB-SEN service? Aer Arann on their own is a different matter as they do not serve DUB from the London area so a DUB-SEN could appeal to them.
Perhaps a more realistic prospect is a route from a Continental city with AF/KLM/Cityjet as the operator. AMS-SEN could without doubt support at least a twice-daily service and the time saving advantages might be sufficient for the airline to think it worthwhile. Although it would compete with their LCY services, a SEN service would be aimed at the leisure market to a greater extent, with lower fares, so would be complementary rather than competitive to the LCY route. I would see this route as having the greater chance of being initiated sometime in 2010.
Flybe will just be offering the JER Summer service and I don't see them as jumping in with any other routes and we can discount the prospects of a CAX-SEN services for the whole of 2010 I would guess due to the ongoing legal challenge to the CAX planning consent.
The other possibility is, of course, the restarting of the Ford CGN service in the Spring. This has been hinted at in certain quarters and they have retained the RJ100 so there must be a chance of it happening, but it will be political machinations within Fords which will decide that issue.
So, will 2010 see any new passenger services at SEN? My own view is that the chances are perhaps 60 to 40 against, with Fords being the wild card, and an AMS-SEN service having the greatest chance of happening.
Probably, I shall look back at this thread in 12 months' time and cringe at the idiocy of my predictions - and if it's because SEN is processing 1,500 pax per day I shall at least be a happy idiot. I shall certainly be interested to hear what other Forum members think may happen.
2009 marked the first year that SEN has not had a resident airline (following the closure of Flightline), the loss of the Ford CGN route and the JER service reverting to Summer Saturdays only after a rather feeble attempt in 2008 to introduce an additional Wednesday flight. I don't recall a single passenger charter during the whole year, other than the local flights in the DC3 and Rapide. The only bright spot was that LCY diversions continued to offer a glimpse of the sort of activity the future could hold. All in all a very disappointing year; although perhaps that is not surprising in light of the downturn in the economy which will have made all airlines nervous of starting new routes.
So what are the prospects for 2010? Let me say firstly that I have no information on any definite plans by any airline, although I do detect a certain cautious optimism that there may be tentative plans which are yet to be firmed up. It is certainly true that Stobarts reviewed the station project earlier this year and concluded that it should proceed. There must have been a basis for reaching this conclusion and it has long been the airport's belief that the station will be key to attracting airline operators to SEN. I must reluctantly say that I am a little surprised that a station some 400 metres from the existing terminal is felt to offer much greater appeal than does the existing station at Rochford, as I assume a bus link will be required as it is a considerable distance to walk. A station attached to the planned new terminal would/will be a completely different matter, as time from aircraft to platform could be as little as 5 minutes. I can only assume that an airline or two has suggested that even with the existing terminal in use, the psychological/marketing advantage of SEN having a dedicated rail station will be the clincher to commencing services. Let's hope so at least.
So let's have a look at how feasible this sounds when considering real route possibilities.
To take the very latest 'rumour' doing the rounds, how about the planned Aer Arann/Aer Lingus tie-up which 'could' involve up to seven ATR's being DUB-based for Ireland-UK operations commencing in Spring. Aer Arann have certainly expressed an interest in SEN and discussions have taken place over the past couple of years so, theoretically, this new operation could offer SEN an opportunity. The right route, the right aircraft and the participation of an operator with SEN in mind for potential services, so it all looks feasible on paper, but even as I write this it all sounds so unlikely somehow. Could we really see services into SEN by the Irish flag carrier? The main problem I see is that SEN's advantage of having access to the Greater London/Essex market is also, ironically, its greatest disadvantage. Aer Lingus already operate substantially from LGW with frequent daily services to DUB, so would they want to risk diluting that market with a twice-daily DUB-SEN service? Aer Arann on their own is a different matter as they do not serve DUB from the London area so a DUB-SEN could appeal to them.
Perhaps a more realistic prospect is a route from a Continental city with AF/KLM/Cityjet as the operator. AMS-SEN could without doubt support at least a twice-daily service and the time saving advantages might be sufficient for the airline to think it worthwhile. Although it would compete with their LCY services, a SEN service would be aimed at the leisure market to a greater extent, with lower fares, so would be complementary rather than competitive to the LCY route. I would see this route as having the greater chance of being initiated sometime in 2010.
Flybe will just be offering the JER Summer service and I don't see them as jumping in with any other routes and we can discount the prospects of a CAX-SEN services for the whole of 2010 I would guess due to the ongoing legal challenge to the CAX planning consent.
The other possibility is, of course, the restarting of the Ford CGN service in the Spring. This has been hinted at in certain quarters and they have retained the RJ100 so there must be a chance of it happening, but it will be political machinations within Fords which will decide that issue.
So, will 2010 see any new passenger services at SEN? My own view is that the chances are perhaps 60 to 40 against, with Fords being the wild card, and an AMS-SEN service having the greatest chance of happening.
Probably, I shall look back at this thread in 12 months' time and cringe at the idiocy of my predictions - and if it's because SEN is processing 1,500 pax per day I shall at least be a happy idiot. I shall certainly be interested to hear what other Forum members think may happen.